terça-feira, 15 de dezembro de 2015

Refugiados Jihadistas














As autoridades descobriram vários refugiados na Noruega, com imagens de cabeças decapitadas e bandeira do Estado Islâmico nos seus telemóveis.
Segundo noticia o Jornal  Nettavisen .
Uma sondagem recente revelou ainda que cerca de 21% dos Sírios concordam com as acções do Estado Islâmico e são simpatizantes.

Cada vez surgem mais evidências de jihadistas infiltrados entre os refugiados, três desses jihadistas "refugiados" sírios estiveram envolvidos nos atentados de Paris a 13 de Novembro, e recentemente na Holanda foi preso um "refugiado" de 18 anos que se gabava de ter combatido pelo ISIS na Síria.

Links:
Nettavisen
Infowars


Neste momento milhares de Sírios já estão instalados na Europa, daqui a uns meses vamos ter surpresas desagradáveis.

2 comentários:

  1. Oi, tudo bem? Veja as previsões de ALINE para 2016, https://youtu.be/pXR7qFzXVqo #previsões2016

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Our governments have endangered all of us for generations to come. My children and my children's children will be forced to live in a police state to keep the muslims in line until the day their (the muslims) numbers have grown large enough to make us refugees.





    Why is it the responsibility of any European country to give these “refugees”(most are economic refugees) a better life? Europe has nothing to gain by letting or bringing these people in. Europe, your first and last obligation is to your people. What do the “refugees” have to offer? They bring nothing to the table.




    Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

    Has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Name one. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?




    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?


    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.



    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called "far right" "racist" "Nazis" and "xenophobic". If they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Hint: A name will not destroy a country and it's people. Europe, wake up and take stand before it’s too late and you lose everything.

    ResponderEliminar